Norton

Norton v. Meyers

Good Law
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 588·98 Cal. App. 175·276 P. 611
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 8, 1929Docket No. 6696.California1,476 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Landis, J.

This is an action on a promissory note in the sum of $2,185, given plaintiff as part of the consideration of his agreement to perform a building contract.

In her answer defendant alleges that by reason of the failure of plaintiff to complete the work within the time and as provided by the agreement the consideration for the note wholly failed, and in her cross-complaint asks damages against plaintiff in the sum of $2,925 for failure to perform the building contract and by reason of defective construction and material furnished by plaintiff.

The trial court found that plaintiff has substantially performed the contract and that changes necessary to make the work conform to the agreement could readily be made, and gave judgment against defendant for the amount of the note, less certain allowances for changes in the work performed by plaintiff, to make the same comply with the agreement, detriment caused by failure to perform, for which plaintiff was not at fault, and a sum certain for failure to complete the work within a reasonable time. The amount of allowances made by way of recoupment, aggregating the sum of $850, covering the following items: $100 for damages for failing to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.