Janssen

Janssen v. Tate

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 522·94 Cal. App. 21·270 P. 456
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 1928Docket No. 3551.California963 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Weyand, J.

On the twentieth day of August, 1924, the complaint herein was filed in the superior court of San Diego County to partition certain mining property in said county and to impress the whole of the said mining property with a lien claimed by I. P. Janssen for sums expended by him for thé preservation of said property.

The plaintiffs were I. P. Janssen, individually, and I. P. Janssen as administrator of the estate of Enho Janssen, deceased, and I. P. Janssen as trustee of the Pacific Paint Products Company, a defunct corporation. The complaint avers that the paint company forfeited its charter and ceased to exist as a corporation on March 4, 1922. The only claim of ownership in plaintiff, either individually, or as administrator of the estate of Enho Janssen, or as trustee of the defunct paint company, arises out of ownership of stock in the said defunct company, or because I. P. Janssen was a director of the defunct corporation when it forfeited its charter.

The answer in the suit denies generally the allegations of ownership in the property sought to be partitioned, the expenditures by Janssen, and further pleads an estoppel in the way of a judgment rendered as against the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.