Ferguson

Ferguson v. Fonner

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 72·87 Cal. App. 590·262 P. 337
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 15, 1927Docket No. 6030.California1,047 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Cashin, J.

An appeal from a judgment entered against appellant Fonner in an action to recover a debt.

Respondent moved to dismiss" the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was not filed within the time prescribed by statute.

The judgment appealed from was entered on June 12, 1925, and on June 15, 1925, a notice of its entry was served on appellant. On June 25, 1925, a notice of intention to move for a new trial was filed, the notice stating that the motion would be presented on the minutes of the court and by affidavits. The motion was not presented until August 24, 1925, on which date it was denied for lack of jurisdiction, and the notice of appeal was filed on the same day. Respondent contends that no steps having been taken to bring the motion to a hearing within sixty days after the! service of the notice of entry of judgment there was no proceeding for a new trial pending within the provisions of section 939 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which would extend the time for an appeal from the judgment, and that the notice of appeal was filed too late.

As held in the matter of the Estate of Bergland, 177 Cal. 227 [ 170 Pac. 400 ], the filing of a notice of intention to move for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.