Jones

Jones v. Sturzenberg

Good Law
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 60·59 Cal. App. 350·210 P. 835
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 16, 1922Civ. No. 2519.California2,787 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

The land in controversy was assessed in 1913 to A. M. and E. L. Miller and, the taxes thereon becoming delinquent, the land was duly sold to the state in 1914 for the sum of $50.21. In 1914 the land was assessed to E. L. Walker and Wm. T. Parker and, on their failure to pay the taxes for that year, the land was again sold to the state in 1915, contrary to the express provisions of section 3814 of the Political Code. All subsequent taxes were allowed to become delinquent up to the year 1918, when the then owner applied to the county auditor for an estimate of the sum necessary to redeem. The auditor made the re quired estimate based on the purported sale to the state in 1915, inadvertently overlooking the sale to the state in 1914, and the owner paid the amount so estimated. The pleadings' admit that the land is of the value of $5,000. The defendant Sturzenberg alleges in his cross-complaint that the land is worth $10,000 and there is ample evidence to support the allegation. It is further admitted by the pleadings that the consideration for the deed from Williams to Eich, hereinafter referred to, was less than $500 and that for the conveyance from E'ich to plaintiffs less than…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.