Estate of Thayer

Laymance v. Utter

Good Law
1 Cal. App. 104·1905 Cal. App. LEXIS 95·81 P. 658
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 1, 1905No. 22.California727 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Hall, J.

This is an appeal by M. J. Laymance, who is described in his notice of appeal as “a party in interest in said estate, and assignee of Mary L. Flick, one of the legatees and devisees under the last will and testament of said N. D. Thayer, deceased,” from an order settling the final account of the executor.

The transcript contains no bill of exceptions or statement authenticated in any way by the judge of the trial court, but contains certain documents certified to by the clerk, as follows :—

Appellant in his brief states that “The sole question involved in and by this appeal concerns the power and jurisdiction of the said superior court to make and enter an order in said estate, settling and allowing the final account of the executor prior to the filing of the said remittitur in the superior court.”

We are of the opinion that such question is not properly presented by the record before us. It has been held that the judgment-roll on an appeal from an order settling the account of an executor consists of the petition and account, and reports accompanying same, objection and exceptions thereto (if any), findings of the court (if any), and order settling account. (Estate of Isaacs,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.