Nolan

Stimson Mill Co. v. Nolan

Good Law
1907 Cal. App. LEXIS 248·5 Cal. App. 754·91 P. 262
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 19, 1907Civ. No. 355.California2,518 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Allen, J.

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Los Angeles county.

It appears from the record that on or before June 22, 1903, defendant Nolan, the owner of the premises involved, and one Culver, a contractor, had concluded oral negotiations through which Culver had agreed to furnish materials and construct a house on said premises for the consideration of $3,100. That on said last-named date Culver, with Nolan’s consent, commenced the work of such construction, and certain lien claimants delivered upon the premises the brick necessary for the foundation, while others delivered upon the premises the lumber necessary for the construction. Thereafter, on June 26, Nolan and Culver entered into a written contract for the construction of the house, which was in all respects the same as the oral agreement. In this written contract the construction price of $3,100 was made payable in four equal installments, of which three were to be paid during the construction, and the last “when the house was completed and receipts in full shown to the owner. ’ ’ After this contract had been executed, and such contract and an accompanying bond filed in the recorder’s office, other lien claimants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.