Henshey

North Hollywood Mortgage Co. v. Henshey

Good Law
126 Cal. App. 411·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 444·14 P.2d 842
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 27, 1932Docket No. 4566.California1,908 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

The respondents’ demurrers to plaintiff’s second amended complaint were sustained without leave to amend, and thereafter the action was dismissed by the trial court of its own motion. The cause is here upon the plaintiff’s appeal.

The complaint sets forth eleven causes of action, and if any one of the causes of action set forth contains sufficient facts to require an order overruling respondents’ demurrers thereto, the judgment must be reversed. With this in view we will set forth herein in regular order all the allegations constituting the seventh cause of action, which in effect prays for a judgment quieting title to the lands and premises now owned by the plaintiff. The several causes of action set forth in the complaint detail the issuance of stock, the sale of stock, and the transfer of stock in violation of the order of the corporation commissioner of the state of California. That these violations may have taken place prior to the plaintiff having acquired title to the premises now owned by it does not estop the plaintiff from maintaining its action to quiet title if the mortgages hereinafter referred to were executed without consideration.

On the part of the appellant it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.