Ulm

Ulm v. Prather

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 126·49 Cal. App. 141·192 P. 878
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 30, 1920Civ. No. 2187.California2,164 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nicol, J.

This is an action brought by plaintiff for an accounting and thereby a determination of the amount to which the parties to this action are respectively entitled by reason of a certain agreement of co-partnership entered into by and between the plaintiff and defendants on June 1, 1909.

The said agreement was to run from the said first day of June, 1909, to the thirtieth day of September, 1913, and provided for operating and farming on joint account the premises -known as the “Shasta View Ranch,” situate in Siskiyou County, and containing about 2,600 acres of land.

The complaint alleges that the defendants did not farm the land as provided for by the said contract and that plaintiff was damaged thereby in the sum of $6,780.70; that plaintiff advanced money to the copartnership in the sum of $3,289.70, and that the defendants owed the copartnership $3,850 'for money drawn from the copartnership. The complaint further alleges that defendants removed from the property a large portion of the joint property of the parties to said agreement, without the consent of plaintiff and that plaintiff, by reason of the failure of the defendants to render monthly statements as provided in said…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.