King

King v. Elton

Good Law
1905 Cal. App. LEXIS 119·2 Cal. App. 145·83 P. 261
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 9, 1905Civ. No. 139.California334 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Smith, J.

This is an appeal from an order made after a judgment for the plaintiff granting the defendants a new trial. The motion was granted solely on the ground of misconduct of the jury, “in that the jurors were induced to assent to said verdict by a resort to the determination of chance.”

The verdict was given by nine jurors out of twelve, and the order was based on the affidavits of two of the noneoncur ring jurors, which were to the following effect: That after all nine jurors had agreed upon a verdict “it was thereupon moved by one of said nine jurors that each juror should put down privately on a slip of paper the amount which he favored for the verdict; that these several amounts should be added together and their sum divided by twelve, and that the quotient so obtained should be the amount of the verdict; that said motion was agreed to and carried by the votes of nine jurors”; that this plan was carried into effect, resulting in the adoption of the amount of the verdict, “whicfy amount was then at once, without further discussion and consideration, in pursuance to said previous agreement, accepted by said nine jurors to the amount of the verdict, and entered in the form of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.