Burns

Burns v. the Valley Bank

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 381·94 Cal. App. 254·271 P. 107
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 8, 1928Docket No. 6343.California1,678 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Parker, J.

This action was brought in the court below by the respondent as assignee of Leo V. Young-worth, attorney at law, to recover the sum of fifteen hundred dollars for legal services alleged to have been rendered the defendants at their special instance and request between January 1, 1924, and February 8th of the same year. At the trial the action was dismissed as to the defendant W. D. Mitchell, and the ease proceeded as against Valley Bank, appellant. Judgment was entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant Valley Bank for the full amount prayed. A motion for a new trial was made and denied, and the present appeal is from the judgment.

The only question presented is as to whether the appellant Valley Bank employed Mr. Youngworth to render the services performed by him. Appellant makes no contention as to the rendering of the services, or that their value was not as found, but insists that the services were not rendered to the appellant.

A brief synopsis of the facts becomes necessary to illustrate the contentions made.

In January, 1924, the Valley Bank was a corporation duly engaged in the business of general banking pursuant to the laws of this state. W. D. Mitchell was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.