Matchette

Matchette v. California Fruit Canners Ass'n

Good Law
33 Cal. App. 156·164 P. 423·164 P.2d 423
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 3, 1917Civ. No. 1933.California1,914 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

Charles C. Matchette, a brakeman in the employ of the harbor commissioners of the state of California on its belt line railroad in the city and county of San Francisco, met his death while in the performance of his duties as a member of a switching crew on the premises of the defendant, the California Fruit Canners Association. This action was brought by his widow and minor daughter to recover damages for his death, which is alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the defendant. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs and against the defendant for the sum of five thousand dollars, and from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial the defendant appeals.

The first contention of the appellant is that the evidence fails to establish that any duty owed to the deceased by the appellant was left unperformed, or that it was guilty of any negligence whatever, but that, on the contrary, the evidence affirmatively shows that the death of Matchette resulted from Ms own negligence. From the correctness of this contention we see no escape.

The record discloses the following facts: The defendant at the time of the injury complained of owned and maintained…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.