Los Angeles Pressed Brick Co. v. Los Angeles Pacific Boulevard & Development Co.
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Taggart, J.
An action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Judgment for plaintiff. Appeals were taken from the judgment and an order denying a new trial.
The defendant Los Angeles Pacific Boulevard and Development Company is the owner of a brick building erected by defendants Brown & Alcorn as contractors, defendant William Leonard being a subcontractor for the brickwork. Plaintiff furnished brick for the construction of the building upon the order of Leonard, and in due time served notice of doing so upon the owner in accordance with the provisions of section 1184 of the Code of Civil Procedure. At the time such notice was given there remained in the hands of the owner more than enough of the contract price, still unpaid to the contractors, to satisfy plaintiff’s claim in full. The contractors, who were not notified of plaintiff’s claim, had paid Leonard, their subcontractor, all that was due him before plaintiff notified the owner.
All parties to the appeal agree that but one question of law is involved in the appeal. Appellants state this as follows: “Under the mechanics’ lien law must the contractor ‘take care of’ the claims of materialmen or employees of the subcontractor under such…