Maginnis

Maginnis v. Hurlbutt

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 257·49 Cal. App. 460·193 P. 606
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 5, 1920Civ. No. 3515.California678 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Richards, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in fayor of the plaintiff in an action to quiet title.

The lands embraced in said action lie along the shore of Clear Lake between the meander line of the lands granted by the United States government to the predecessors of the plaintiff, in the patent on which the latter relies, and the edge of Clear Lake at low-water mark. The defendant, in her pleadings and proofs in the trial court and in her briefs upon this appeal, relies, first, upon a certificate of purchase to said strip of land' issued by the state of California to her predecessor; second, upon adverse possession of said strip of land by H. B. Guernsey, one of the defendant’s predecessors in the possession of said premises; and, third, upon the plaintiff’s laches in the institution of the present action.

As to the first of these contentions, it was resolved by the trial court against the defendant upon evidence which sufficiently tended to show that the lands in question were not swamp and overflowed land within the meaning of that term as used in the act of Congress of September 28, 1850, commonly known as the Swamp Land Act; and hence that the attempted grant of said lands under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.