Winchester
State Savings & Commercial Bank v. Winchester
Opinion
Lead Opinion
Lennon, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment and from an order denying a new trial. The action was one to foreclose a mortgage executed by defendant and respondent, Elisabeth F. Winchester, as security for the payment of a promissory note in the sum of eleven thousand five hundred dollars, made by the Main-Winchester-Stone Company, as maker, and the respondent as indorser and guarantor. The execution of both the note and mortgage was an admitted fact in the case; but as a defense to the foreclosure proceedings, it was alleged that the note and mortgage were executed without consideration to either the respondent, Elisabeth F. Winchester, or to the Main-Winehester-Stone Company, and that the same were both obtained by false and fraudulent representations.
The facts leading up to the transaction in suit, and out of which the claim of fraud arises, are in substance as follows:
The trial court found that Stoll as the president and general manager of the Main-Winchester-Stone Company was without authority to execute the first renewal note in controversy, that said company never received any benefit from the money obtained upon the note, and that the same was procured to be signed by fraud and…