Fall River Etc. Dist. v. Shasta Etc. Dist.

Good Law
104 Cal. App. 444·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 1009·285 P. 1091
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMarch 11, 1930Docket No. 3871.California4,703 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

The plaintiff had judgment against the defendant in the sum of $8,213.84, together with interest thereon at the rate of seven per cent from the date of entry of judgment, in an action for money had and received by the defendant for the uses and purposes of the plaintiff, based upon allegations that the defendant had collected and had the use and benefit of certain moneys raised by taxation which should have been had, obtained and enjoyed by the plaintiff. From this judgment the defendant appeals. After alleging the existence of the two High School Districts named in the title to this action, the complaint sets forth that on the fourth day of February, 1925, a certain *Page 445 school district, known as the "Bunker Hill School District," formed under the laws of the state, was situate entirely within the exterior boundaries of the Fall River Joint Union High School District, in the county of Shasta; that on the same date, that certain school district, known as "Kosh Creek School District," was an elementary school district situate entirely within the boundaries of the Shasta Union High School District in the county of Shasta; that the boundary line between the two elementary school…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.