Estate of Peacock

In Re Estate of Peacock

Good Law
105 Cal. App. 426·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 777·287 P. 516
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 30, 1930Docket No. 7375.California1,421 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

James C. Peacock died at his home in Berkeley on the eleventh day of October, 1928. Thereafter Loyal R. Peacock presented to the probate court a document purporting to be the last will and testament of the deceased and applied to have the same admitted to probate. Shortly thereafter Zilpha N. Peacock, as the surviving wife of the decedent, filed a contest. The contest was answered and a trial was had before the trial court sitting, with a jury. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the contestant and an order was entered refusing to admit the will to probate. From that order the proponents have appealed and have brought up a typewritten record.

The second amended contest was based on two grounds, unsoundness of mind, and undue influence. At the conclusion of the proceedings had in taking the evidence all issues were abandoned by the contestant except that of undue influence. The proponents assert that there was no evidence introduced to sustain the allegations of undue influence. In support of this assertion they print upwards of 150 pages of the testimony. In reply the contestant summarizes the case and calls to our attention such portions of the record as, according to her…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.