Roantree

Merchants Collecton Agency v. Roantree

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 299·37 Cal. App. 88·173 P. 600
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 29, 1918Civ. No. 2317.California1,092 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Beasly, J.

This action was brought to recover the balance due on a promissory note in the sum of $3,950, executed by the defendants in favor of Gilmartin Company (a corporation), plaintiff’s assignor, upon which the amount of $1,125 had been paid. The defense offered by both defendants was lack of consideration for the note and duress in obtaining it. The trial court found against these defenses, and awarded plaintiff judgment as prayed. This appeal is from the judgment and an order denying defendants ’ motion for a new trial.

James Roantree was employed before the San Francisco fire of April 18, 1906, as bookkeeper for the Gilmartin Company, a printing concern, and received for his services $125 a month. The printing establishment was totally destroyed in that fire, and in the month of July thereafter the company undertook to re-establish its business. Roantree was re-employed, and acted in the various capacities of bookkeeper, salesman, solicitor, assistant manager, and at times sole manager, and as such devoted more time and was burdened with more arduous and responsible duties than formerly. No salary was formally fixed for him by the officers of the company, but he drew from time to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.