MacDonald

Smith v. MacDonald

Good Law
1918 Cal. App. LEXIS 406·37 Cal. App. 503·174 P. 80
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 12, 1918Civ. No. 2400.California565 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, without leave to amend. The action was based upon a written instrument which the trial court held to constitute only a moral obligation. The instrument reads as follows:

We think the clause in this unusual document, that if suit should be brought to enforce collection the obligation shall be void, is a valid and enforceable covenant not to sue, and that the promise to pay the sum agreed constituted merely a moral obligation.

The parties to this agreement were of age and of competent understanding; and as the contract appears to have been freely and voluntarily entered into, and is one that is not against public policy in any respect, it should be upheld. It would be a grave injustice to defendant to hold that an action would lie to enforce the payment of the amount mentioned in this instrument, when it appears that a part of the consideration for the promise to pay was the stipulation on the part of the payee that the obligation should be void if suit should be brought thereon. The right to enforce any obligation which the plaintiff may have had against the defendant was his, and he could do with it as he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.