Coleman

Coleman v. Dawson

Caution
110 Cal. App. 201·1930 Cal. App. LEXIS 86·294 P. 13
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 4, 1930Docket No. 4205.California3,362 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thompson, J.

This is an appeal from a decree enforcing specific performance of an agreement to convey real property.

The defendant owned a tract of land four miles northeast of Porterville, consisting of 96.055 acres. The plaintiff owned five United States patents covering a machine designed to manufacture and compress certain by-products into briquettes for fuel purposes. January 10, 1924, a written agreement was executed between these parties for the sale of an undivided one-tenth interest in these patent rights for $10,000, to be paid by the promissory note of the defendant for the sum of $2,000 and the conveyance of the Porterville ranch at a valuation of $8,000. The terms and conditions of the agreement were incorporated in three documents executed at the same time. These instruments are construed together as a part of the same transaction. The first two are in the following language:

The defendant’s answer admits the execution of the first document above quoted except that it is alleged the plaintiff agreed to sell and transfer an undivided two-twentieths interest in the patents instead of only one-twentieth therein as erroneously recited in the document. This error was conceded. It…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.