English

English v. Shipley

Good Law
1925 Cal. App. LEXIS 465·71 Cal. App. 45·234 P. 334
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 30, 1925Docket No. 4998.California1,536 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The plaintiff sued to recover the amounts due on two promissory notes. Judgment went for the plaintiff and the defendants have appealed.

The controversy arose out of a real estate transaction. An alfalfa farm near Fresno was owned by Mr. Mason. He entered into a contract by which he agreed to sell to J. J. Williams and R. L. Inman. Inman was to purchase an undivided two-thirds and Williams was to purchase an undivided one-third. The terms of that instrument were such that the purchasers were to go into possession and one-half of the alfalfa hay was to he delivered to Mr. Mason. After the purchasers had been in possession for a period of time they allowed C. R Shipley to farm the alfalfa, harvest the hay and deliver to Mr. Mason the portion to which he was entitled under the contract. After that arrangement had been followed for a while, on the fifth day of June, 1922, Shipley made oral contracts. By the terms of one agreement he agreed to purchase the two-thirds interest of Inman, and by the terms of another agreement he agreed to purchase the one-third interest of Williams. As to Williams the purchase price was $933. Of that sum Shipley paid in cash $133 and executed two…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.