Jordahl

Jordahl v. Hayda

Good Law
1 Cal. App. 696·1905 Cal. App. LEXIS 157·82 P. 1079
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 4, 1905No. 73.California1,617 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Chiphan, J.

The defendants are members and agents of the Cooks and Waiters’ Alliance, Local No. 220, of the city of Eureka, and plaintiff is the proprietor of the so-called Fairwind Restaurant at that city. The action is for an injunction restraining defendants “from the commission of any acts or the use of any methods within or in the immediate vicinity of the plaintiff’s said restaurant and premises, which will tend to hinder, impede, or obstruct the plaintiff in the transaction of the business of said plaintiff at said Fairwind Restaurant in said premises, or hinder, intimidate or annoy the patrons or customers of plaintiff as they visit said restaurant and premises and depart from the same, and from annoying and intimidating persons who may desire to work-in plaintiff’s said premises.” Plaintiff had judgment, from which defendants appeal, and from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

The brief of appellants is confined to a discussion of the alleged insufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings. The particular parts of the findings thus attacked are quoted in the brief and are as follows: That defendants members of said association “have interfered with and intimidated…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.