Smith v. Golden State Syndicate

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 758·43 Cal. App. 346·185 P. 209
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 1919Civ. No. 3028.California880 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Langdon, J.

This is an action to quiet title to certain real property in the city of Los Angeles. E. C. Laux, the respondent, filed a complaint in intervention, claiming to be the owner of a portion of the land described in plaintiff's complaint. The action was tried and judgment given upon the complaint in intervention of E. C. Laux and the answer thereto of J. H. Smith. The complaint in intervention was in form a suit to quiet title and alleged that the intervener was the owner in fee of the real property therein described. The answer was a denial of the title of the intervener. The court found that the intervener had no right or title to the said property except that he had purchased a tax deed therefor from the city of Los Angeles, and further found that said tax deed was null and void. Judgment was entered against the intervener and in favor of the appellant, but it was provided therein that said judgment should not take effect until payment by the appellant to said intervener of $561.35, the amount of taxes paid by the intervener upon the property. From the portion of the judgment requiring such payment an appeal is taken.

[1] Section 3898 of the Political Code (subdivision 5)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.