Hucke

Mercantile Finance Corp. v. Hucke

Good Law
126 Cal. App. 221·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 471·14 P.2d 558
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 1932Docket No. 8651.California271 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

This is an appeal from an order dismissing the action made under section 583 of the Code of Civil Procedure for want of prosecution within two years after answer filed.

The complaint (to foreclose a mortgage on real property) was filed June 10, 1927, against thirty-five defendants. The last answer was filed October 7, 1927. The default of seven defendants was entered and the plaintiff voluntarily dismissed as to all except Sorrille. The cause was set for trial on April 26, 1929, but went off the calendar. On October 31, 1929, plaintiff gave notice of motion to set the cause for trial and August 12, 1930, was set for that purpose. At that time the defendant Sorrille moved to dismiss the action upon the ground that plaintiff had failed to bring it to trial within two years after the answer was filed. This motion was granted.

Appellant’s attack upon the order is based on the ground that the trial court abused its discretion in granting the motion. Discretion in this respect is exercised on determining the issue of fact whether the plaintiff’s failure to bring the cause to trial within the two-year period is excused. Where the evidence on this issue is conflicting, the appellate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.