Tasker

Tasker v. Cochrane

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 646·94 Cal. App. 361·271 P. 503
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 1928Docket No. 3573.California1,830 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the superior court granting a new trial after judgment had been rendered in favor of the plaintiff, based upon the verdict of the jury.

The action was prosecuted by the plaintiff as the assignee of Messrs. Janeway, Beach, and Pratt, attorneys at law of Los Angeles, to recover the sum of $6,000 alleged to be the reasonable value of legal services rendered the defendant, and also to recover the further sum of $1,500.30, moneys alleged to have been paid out and advanced by said attorneys for and on behalf of the defendant.

The answer of the defendant practically admits the employment of said firm of attorneys, but denies that the value of the services rendered was greater than the sum of $500. The answer also contains a complete denial of any part of the sum of $1,500.30, representing the moneys paid out by the attorneys. The jury awarded the plaintiff the sum of $6,000 as the value of the legal services performed, and also found in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,500.30 on account of moneys paid out, costs, etc.

The defendant’s motion for a new trial contained the following specifications:

The order of the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.