Mahl

Mahl v. E.A. Portal Co., Inc.

Good Law
1927 Cal. App. LEXIS 899·81 Cal. App. 494·254 P. 278
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 1927Docket No. 5746.California615 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The petitioner applied to E. A. Portal Co., a corporation, and C. A. Budd, its secretary, to have a certificate of stock transferred on the books of the corporation, the respondents refused to make the transfer, and the petitioner has applied to this court for a writ of mandate directing the respondents to make the transfer. The parties stipulated as follows:

In Cook on Corporations, sixth edition, section 391, the author said: 1 £ This (remedy by suit in equity) is the surest, most complete, and most just remedy for compelling a corporation to register a transfer of stock, and for adjusting the various conflicting rights or claims of other parties. It is a remedy applicable to almost all cases arising under a refusal of the corporation to allow a registry of transfer. The ease will be decided on equitable principles, however; and a transfer will not be decreed if it involves bad faith. The corporation itself is of course a necessary and in fact the chief defendant where stock has been presented for transfer, which has '.,ee"> refused. In a suit in equity by the claimant of stock against other parties, claiming the stock, the corporation is a proper but not a necessary party…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.