McAlister

McAlister v. Lightburn

Good Law
126 Cal. App. 6·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 510·14 P.2d 133
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 1932Docket No. 8310.California3,356 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lamberson, J.

Action upon a promissory

note for the principal sum of $7,500, dated September 14, 1927, payable ninety days after date, executed by the defendants and appellants to plaintiff, who is the respondent herein.

The appellants first filed separate answers, each alleging: First, that he had received no consideration for the execution of the note; and second, that the note was given as security against liens that might be filed against a certain apartment house and premises known as "Elite Arms”, situated at 258 South Hudson Street, city of Pasadena, and that it was verbally understood and agreed between the makers and payee that upon the expiration of thirty-five days after the completion of said premises, the plaintiff would return the note to the makers, provided no liens had, in the meantime, been filed or paid by plaintiff. Each answer set up a further defense that the plaintiff had failed to comply with the provisions of an agreement whereby, in consideration of the assignment of a note for the sum of $35,000, secured by a deed of trust upon the property upon which the Elite Arms was to be constructed, the plaintiff had agreed to pay the sum of $27,500, and that the plaintiff had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.