Culver

Culver v. Miller

Good Law
1921 Cal. App. LEXIS 518·54 Cal. App. 545·202 P. 338
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 14, 1921No. 3549.California1,262 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Craig, J.

This is an - action for damages for the breach of a written contract by which plaintiff alleged that he leased 170 acres of land from the defendants; that by the lease it was agreed that plaintiff should receive from defendants 312 shares of capital stock of the Imperial Water Company No. 1; that they furnished only a part of said stock and that the plaintiff was thereby damaged in the sum of $2,000. Defendants interposed a general demurrer iwhich was overruled. They thereupon filed an answer and counterclaim for $3,000 damages. After trial, the court rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $600. Defendant moved for a new trial and the motion was overruled. This appeal is from the order overruling the motion for a new trial and judgment for $600.

[1] The first ground urged for a reversal is that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. In this behalf it is said that the complaint should have stated of what the capital stock of the Imperial Water Company No. 1 consists and the quantity of water in inches and feet that plaintiff would be entitled to as the possessor of 312 shares; how many acres it would have irrigated; how many acres…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.