Stenzel

Stenzel v. Kronick

Good Law
1928 Cal. App. LEXIS 651·94 Cal. App. 327·271 P. 211
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 13, 1928Docket No. 6337.California713 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Strother, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff for damages claimed to have been suffered as the result of defendant fraudulently inducing plaintiff to convey real property in exchange for a mortgage.

Plaintiff was the owner of real property in Los Angeles County which he wished to sell in order to supply an urgent need for money. In a conversation with the defendant, plaintiff told him of his necessity, and defendant asked what price he would take for the property. Plaintiff named a price, net to himself. A few days later defendant told plaintiff that he had a cash buyer for the property, but that in order to turn it plaintiff would have to increase a mortgage on the property to about half the price. Defendant negotiated and procured a loan for plaintiff.

Thereafter defendant told plaintiff that the trade he had in mind was the transfer to plaintiff of a note for $8,000 secured by mortgage on land in San Bernardino County; that the maker of the note was then in San Francisco raising the money to pay it off, and it would be practically a cash transaction.

Plaintiff, at defendant’s instance, gave escrow instructions to a bank to deliver the deed of his property upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.