Taylor

Taylor v. Bunnell

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 449·77 Cal. App. 525·247 P. 240
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 22, 1926Docket No. 3069.California3,830 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Finch, J.

The defendant is a physician and surgeon and for many years has been engaged in practice in San Francisco. In the year 1906 he and Margaret A. Peterson married and they thereafter lived together as hus band and wife until the death of the latter on the thirtieth day of May, 1921. Both had been married before and, at the time of their intermarriage, Margaret Peterson was childless and the defendant had two daughters, who were then young girls and were living with and thereafter continued to live with their grandmother. No children were born of the second marriage. The defendant owned property in San Francisco, the extent and value thereof not appearing. At the time of and prior to her marriage to defendant, Mrs. Peterson owned 926 acres of land in Glenn County, which she had received from her father’s estate. At the time of the trial it was of the value of $25 an acre. ,W. H. Taylor is joined as a party plaintiff for the sole reason that he is the husband of Alma Taylor and the latter, therefore, will be referred to as the plaintiff. The ¡plaintiff is a daughter of a deceased sister of Mrs. Bunnell. • In June, 1920, Mrs. Bunnell underwent a serious operation and was thereafter an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.