Freligh

Freligh v. McGrew

Good Law
124 Cal. App. 405·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 766·12 P.2d 965
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 21, 1932Docket No. 4572.California2,671 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Plummer, J.

The plaintiff began this action to recover the sum of $1,000, and also to obtain a decree of the trial court rescinding and setting aside a certain indenture of lease entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant Susan B. McGrew. Other parties were named as defendants, but this appeal involves only the defendant Susan B. McGrew.

The complaint sets forth two causes of action. The first is a simple cause of action alleging the indebtedness of the defendant to the plaintiff in the sum of $1,000, and praying for a judgment for the recovery of that sum. The second cause of action is to obtain a decree rescinding, setting aside and annulling a certain indenture of lease dated September 8, 1926. This cause of action sets forth that the defendant represented to the plaintiff that she was the owner of certain property described as the “McGrew Apartments”, located in the city of Los Angeles. The complaint further sets forth that in the negotiations leading up to the execution of the lease, it was mutually understood and agreed that a former tenant of the premises was about to vacate the same, and that the defendant represented to the plaintiff that the former tenant was selling the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.