Crescent Investment Co. v. Lake County Investment Co.

Good Law
38 Cal. App. 642·177 P. 167
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 12, 1918Civ. No. 2552.California344 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lennon, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff. The appeal is upon the judgment-roll alone.

The complaint asked for the foreclosure of a mortgage upon certain real property owned by the defendants. Defendants in their answer denied the execution of the note and mortgage and substantially all the material allegations of the complaint, and set up by way of separate defense certain alleged acts of fraud on the part of one of the directors and stockholders of the plaintiff company. The plaintiff demurred to this separate defense and the demurrer was sustained. Certainly if the plaintiff was a bona fid& mortgagee and had advanced the money secured by the mortgage, the matters alleged in the separate defense would be immaterial in this foreclosure suit, and the demurrer was properly sustained. The questions of the execution of the mortgage and the consideration therefor were tried under the issues raised by the complaint and the denials thereof and the trial court found in favor of the plaintiff.

The appellants raise just one point upon their appeal, and we agree with the attorney for respondent, that the law applicable to that question would seem to require no…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.