Irwin

Irwin v. Murphy

Good Law
129 Cal. App. 713·1933 Cal. App. LEXIS 1094·19 P.2d 292
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 20, 1933Docket No. 8459.California2,159 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Parker, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment made upon an order sustaining, without leave to amend, a demurrer to plaintiff’s amended complaint in an action to recover damages for libel and slander.

We summarize the complaint. It is alleged that in the year 1929 defendant, together with eighteen other persons, constituted the grand jury in and for the city and county of San Francisco, regularly drawn, impaneled and sworn; that on or about September 26, 1930, the said persons, acting under order of official authority as a grand jury, did make and publish openly and publicly, and cause to be circulated, a certain written report. This written report set forth that the grand jury had made an investigation into the details connected with a certain boxing contest theretofore held in the city and county of San Francisco and that the evidence presented to the grand jury did not permit the return of indictments against any of the principals involved. The report then continued and stated that' the evidence presented did justify certain conclusions. These conclusions referred to the manner in which boxing matches were conducted, and the conduct and character of those connected with the promotion and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.