Patch

Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. Patch

Good Law
116 Cal. App. 584·3 P.2d 35
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 1931Docket No. 7587.California2,161 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Ward, J.

On November 10, 1927, defendant borrowed the sum of $50,000 from plaintiff. The loan was evidenced by a promissory note and a deed of trust. Subsequently defendant failed to meet the installment payments of the note and plaintiff declared the note and deed of trust to be in default and commenced proceedings on April 23, 1929, for the sale of the property under the deed of trust. In due time a sale took place and plaintiff bid the property in for the sum of $40,000, leaving a deficiency of $13,889.61. This action was instituted upon the deficiency. This is defendant’s fourth attempt to answer and cross-complain, and consists of nine separate answers and eight separate cross-complaints. The first cross-complaint is set forth by reference to the second answer and so on until the eighth cross-complaint refers to allegations set forth in the ninth answer. Herein reference to an answer by number will also refer to the corresponding cross-complaint. A companion cross-complaint does not appear with the answer designated as first answer. A general and special demurrer was interposed to the-second and succeeding answers and the cross-complaints.

In the clerk’s transcript on appeal the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.