Greening

Greening v. Ford

Good Law
127 Cal. App. 462·1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 371·16 P.2d 143
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaNovember 14, 1932Docket No. 7240.California702 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Stephens, J.

This is an automobile collision ease and was tried before a jury. It is here on appeal from an order of the trial court granting a new trial to plaintiffs. The facts relevant to the appeal are as follows: In presenting the case to the jury the following occurred: “Mr. Parker [attorney for defendants] : I tell you, ladies and gentlemen, if Mr. Ford is responsible for this accident he is guilty of a criminal act—of a crime. Mr. Pray [attorney for plaintiffs] : Just a moment, your honor, I assign that statement of counsel as misconduct and as not the law. Mr. Parker: I believe it is the law. The Court: I do not think that it is a true statement of the law. I will have to differ in opinion with you. In other words, a person might be responsible civilly in damages for negligence and yet his conduct' might not be sufficiently wanton to amount to a crime, and I think you are in error in that statement, and the jury is instructed to disregard it”; whereupon counsel for defendants stated to the jury: “Ladies and gentlemen, do not take the law from me. All I ask is that you follow the law and the instructions given to you by this court.” The arguments were finished without further event,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.