Allman

Allman v. Rich

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 497·76 Cal. App. 601·245 P. 439
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 1926Docket No. 5282.California1,677 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Nourse, J.

Morris Allman and Bernard Altman commenced this action to impress a trust on certain real property alleged to have been purchased by the defendant with funds furnished by the plaintiffs. Morris Allman has since deceased and the action has been prosecuted by his administrator. Judgment went for the plaintiffs, from which the defendant appeals on typewritten transcripts.

In their complaint the plaintiffs alleged that on October 5, 1920, each of the plaintiffs entered into a contract in writing with the defendant in the same form, substance, and tenor by which it was agreed that the defendant should purchase the land in suit on behalf of himself and the two plaintiffs, the interest of each to be an undivided interest in proportion to the amount paid by each, and that each of the plaintiffs was to furnish defendant the sum of $1,500 for that purpose; that each of the plaintiffs, on the execution of his contract paid the defendant $1,500. It is then alleged that at the time of the execution of the contract the defendant represented to each of the plaintiffs that he was purchasing the land from the Southern Pacific Railway Company at the price of $15 an acre, while in truth he paid but…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.