MacDonald

San Francisco Clearing-House v. MacDonald

Good Law
18 Cal. App. 212·1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 343·122 P. 964
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaFebruary 13, 1912Civ. No. 899.California2,582 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lennon, J.

This is an action upon a promissory note wherein the plaintiff, as the assignee of the payee for the purpose of collection only, recovered a judgment against the defendant in the sum of $1,546, from which an appeal has been taken upon the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.

Plaintiff’s ease rested upon proof of the execution of the note, the amount due and unpaid thereon, and its assignment to plaintiff for the purpose of collection.

A reversal of the judgment is asked for because of an alleged error in the admission of evidence, and on the ground that the findings of the trial court are not supported by the evidence, and that the findings in turn do not support the judgment.

In substance the undisputed facts of the case, as shown by the evidence and findings, are these: W. S. Gage, W. L. B. Mills and L. D. MacDonald, the defendant in this action, at one time were copartners in the lumber business in the city of San Francisco, under the firm name of Gage, Mills & Company. The copartnership was dissolved by mutual consent on November 20, 1904. At and prior to its dissolution the firm of Gage, Mills & Co. was indebted to W. S. Gage .personally in the sum of $19,000, and some…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.