[1] Deeds—Delivery—Inferences- -Finding.—In an action to quiet title to certain real property claimed by the defendants under deeds alleged by plaintiff not to have been delivered, if the evidence upon the question of delivery is such that different inferences might reasonably be drawn therefrom, the finding of the trial court is conclusive.

[2] Id.—Recordation Delayed—Delivery not Affected.—The fact that a grantor requests that the deeds should not be recorded until the happening of some future event will have no effect upon their delivery.

[3] Id.—Judgment of Insanity—Evidence.—A judgment that a given person is insane establishes the mental condition of such person only as of the date of the judgment, and is not proof of insanity at a time prior to the date stated therein.

[4] Id.—Certificate of Medical Examiners—Evidence.—A certificate of the medical examiners attached to such judgment stating, among other things, that the “present attack began one and one-half months ago,” is not conclusive of the fact as against persons not parties to the proceeding.

[5] Id.—Disposition of Property — Test of Capacity.—It is not every symptom or indication of insanity which will render one incompetent to dispose of his property. If one is able to understand and carry in mind the nature and situation of his property, and his relations to his relatives and those around him, with clear remembrance as to those in whom and those things in which he has been mostly interested, and is capable of understanding the act he is doing and the relation in which he stands to the objects of his bounty, free from any delusion, the effect of disease, which might lead him to dispose of his property otherwise than he would if he knew and understood what he was doing, he has the capacity to dispose of his property.

5. Capacity to make contract as affected by mental condition, note, 3 L. R. A. (N. S.) 174; to make deed, note, 19 L. R. A. 489.