Standing

Standing v. Morosco

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 772·43 Cal. App. 244·184 P. 954
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 8, 1919Civ. No. 1879.California1,208 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

James, J.

The demurrer of defendant on general and special grounds was sustained to the third amended complaint of the plaintiff and leave to further amend was denied. Judgment of dismissal followed, from which plaintiff appeale'd.

The cause of action attempted to be alleged was one for damages sustained by the plaintiff through the refusal of the defendant to use and pay for the services of the plaintiff after having employed him as an actor to appear in plays produced by the defendant in his theater at Los Angeles. Plaintiff alleged that the engagement was for a period of one year. It is respondent’s contention that the complaint in its allegations showed a case falling within the statute of frauds, and that plaintiff could not recover because the term of employment was not fixed in any writing. An agreement which is not to be performed within one year from the making thereof, in order to be valid, must be expressed in writing. (Civ. Code, sec. 1624, subd. 1.) In order to avoid the effect of the statute, it is appellant’s position that there was such part performance of the contract shown as to raise an estoppel against respondent, preventing him from questioning the validity of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.