Lindholm

Lindholm v. Northwestern Pacific Railroad

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 23·79 Cal. App. 34·248 P. 1033
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 27, 1926Docket No. 5476.California2,326 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Knight, J.

An appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of nonsuit in an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff as a result of the alleged negligent acts of defendant’s employees.

The correctness of the trial court’s ruling on the motion for nonsuit depends mainly upon the determination of the question of whether appellant, at the time he received the injuries, was, as he claims, an invited licensee upon the premises where the accident occurred, or was, as the trial court declared by its judgment of nonsuit, “a trespasser or at best a bare licensee.”

The following are the facts: During the lunch hour on the day of the accident, appellant, a hoisting engineer employed by the King Coal Company, whose premises adjoin those of the Moore Shipbuilding Company in Oakland, entered the yards of said shipbuilding company for the purpose of visiting a relative aboard a vessel which he supposed was docked in said yards. The entire shipbuilding yards are inclosed by a fence, the only entrance thereto from the land side being through a gate at which a watchman is stationed, but plaintiff was allowed to enter said yards unchallenged on account of having been in there frequently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.