Hawley

Tucker, Lynch & Coldwell, Inc. v. Hawley

Bad Law
1913 Cal. App. LEXIS 246·23 Cal. App. 460·138 P. 358
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 10, 1913Civ. No. 1303.California1,437 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Kerrigan, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff and from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial, in an action for services rendered as a real estate broker by the plaintiff to the defendant.

Defendant was the owner of a certain piece of real estate in San Francisco, which he desired to lease for warehouse purposes. On several occasions he had conversed with A. C. Hastings, an employee of the plaintiff, in regard to a tenant. In January, 1910, he again saw Hastings, showed him a working plan of a building he intended to erect, and told him that if he would bring him a tenant who desired a warehouse, he would pay the usual real estate commission. In response to an oral arrangement thereupon entered into, Hastings at once made efforts to find a tenant, and later Hastings in company with Colbert Coldwell, another employee of the plaintiff, saw the defendant in his office, and Coldwell told defendant that he thought that a tenant had been secured for the property, and asked to see the plans of the proposed warehouse so as to be able to discuss the matter with the prospective tenant. After spending some time in examining the plans it was seen that they were complicated,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.