McKamy

McKamy v. Bd. of Tr. of Bakersfield

Good Law
1915 Cal. App. LEXIS 258·26 Cal. App. 315·146 P. 910
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJanuary 13, 1915Civ. No. 1677.California552 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Petitioner, who was city marshal of the city of Bakersfield, was by decree of court, pursuant to the provisions of section 772 of the Penal Code, deprived of his office and adjudged to pay a fine of five hundred dollars to W. C. Dorris, at whose relation the accusation was filed. The proceeding is brought against the board of trustees of the city of Bakersfield; neither the court which rendered the decree, nor Dorris, the relator, being made a party herein. The prayer of the petition is that a writ of prohibition issue directed to said board of trustees and its members, prohibiting it and them from proceeding to appoint a city marshal to fill the vacancy created in said office by the removal of petitioner therefrom, and also asking that the judgment rendered in favor of said W. C. Dorris, relator, for five hundred dollars be set aside. The proceeding is not directed against that part of the decree adjudging that petitioner be deprived of his office. It also appears from the record that the petitioner unsuccessfully sought to have the proceeding reviewed in the supreme court both on appeal and by writ of review, the denial of which writ, since an appeal does not lie (People v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.