Seaman

People v. Seaman

Good Law
101 Cal. App. 302·1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 234·281 P. 660
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaOctober 18, 1929Docket No. 1550.California1,264 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Sturtevant, J.

The district attorney filed an information against the defendants charging them with robbery. The defendants appeared and each pleaded not guilty. They were tried together before the trial court sitting with a jury. It returned separate verdicts finding each defendant guilty of robbery in the first degree. The defendants made a motion for a new trial. The motion was denied. From a judgment entered on the verdicts and from the order denying a new trial the defendants have appealed.

The defendants contend that the evidence does not justify a judgment greater than that of second degree robbery. They call to our attention that the defendant John Nissrod was the active operator. That on the ninth day of March, 1929, he entered Compton’s restaurant at No. 8 Kearny Street, San Francisco, and went to the mezzanine floor where Edward Lessner was making up the cash. Nissrod entered the room where Lessner was and, holding a pistol in one hand, he pointed it at Lessner and called upon him to throw up his hands, which Lessner did. Nissrod then approached Lessner, still holding the pistol pointed at him, and took out of Lessner’s pocket Lessner’s key. Lessner testified that he threw up his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.