McTigue

McTigue v. Arctic Ice Cream Supply Co.

Good Law
1912 Cal. App. LEXIS 210·20 Cal. App. 708·130 P. 165
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaDecember 27, 1912Civ. No. 1103.California3,531 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Lennon, J.

Appeal from judgment and order denying motion for new trial.

In this action the plaintiff sought to recover from the defendants, Arctic Ice Cream Supply Company (a corporation) and George W. Morse, the sum of $921.35, claimed to be due to the plaintiff under the terms of an oral agreement alleged to have been entered into with the plaintiff, by the defendants Arctic Ice Cream Supply Company and Morse jointly, for the care, feed, and treatment of twelve horses belonging to the corporation, and which it was claimed were used by it in the transaction of its business at the time the indebtedness here sued on was incurred. Seven of the stockholders of the corporation defendant were joined as defendants in the action but the demurrers of five of them, viz., Eggers, Powers, Parker, Harbour, and Kellum were sustained by the lower court; and subsequently at the request of the plaintiff the action as to these particular defendants was dismissed. The record does not show that the defendants Binglay and Parry appeared in the action, or that any judgment was rendered for or against either of them. The defendant, Grace D. Ohnimus, sued as a stockholder, joined in the answer of the defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.