Schiffman

Schiffman v. Peerless Motor Car Co.

Good Law
13 Cal. App. 600·1910 Cal. App. LEXIS 278·110 P. 460
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 15, 1910Civ. No. 810.California1,323 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Taggart, J.

Action to recover damages for breach of contract. Judgment for plaintiff and defendant appeals therefrom and from an order denying its motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff and defendant entered into an agreement on January 28, 1905, which recites that defendant is engaged in the manufacture of motor ears and parts which it desires to market to the best advantage, and that plaintiff proposes to engage in the sale of defendant’s product and agrees to purchase a certain number of its motor cars, to be resold within a certain ;fixed territory named (seven counties of Southern California). Plaintiff agreed not to sell or solicit orders for any cars outside of the territory named at any time prior to November 1, 1905, and defendant agreed not to solicit any orders or sell any cars within said territory, within that time, but to refer all inquiries from persons residing within that territory to the plaintiff. The plaintiff was to maintain proper quarters in a suitable location in Los Angeles for the storage of stock and the repair of cars and carry a reasonable quantity of supplies and spare parts for the repair and maintenance of motor cars manufactured by defendant, and the latter was to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.