Kleinpeter

Kleinpeter v. Castro

Good Law
11 Cal. App. 83·1909 Cal. App. LEXIS 73·103 P. 1090
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 21, 1909Civ. No. 634.California1,558 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Shaw, J.

Defendant Castro was a notary public whose official bond was made by the defendant American Bonding Company of Baltimore. The action was instituted against Castro as principal and American Bonding Company as surety upon this bond to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by plaintiffs as the result of a false certificate of acknowledgment to a deed made by Castro as such notary. Castro was not served with process, his whereabouts being unknown; neither was his testimony produced at the trial.

, Judgment was given in favor of plaintiffs against the bonding company, from which defendant prosecutes this appeal upon the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.

The court, among other things, found: That the certificate of the notary was false''and that the true name of the person who signed and acknowledged the deed was other than the name signed thereto.

Says appellant, “upon the sufficiency of the evidence to support these two findings the merits of this appeal depend.”

The deed purported to be a grant of a lot to plaintiffs, and appellant concedes that the person who executed it was not the owner thereof, but that he, whatever his name, so far as the ownership of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.