Schwarz

People v. Schwarz

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 373·78 Cal. App. 561·248 P. 990
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 1926Docket No. 1230.California6,885 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Craig, J.

The appellants, together with defendant Donlin, were tried upon an indictment charging them with having conspired to obtain money and property from divers persons by unlawful, false, and fraudulent pretenses and representations. Each of the appellants was convicted and presented a motion for new trial, which was denied, and they appeal from the respective judgments and orders accordingly entered by the trial court.

It appears that Schwarz, Donlin, and one Clark were officers of a corporation known as the Securities Corporation of Southern California (referred to herein for convenience as the Securities Company), which maintained its offices and principal place of business in the city of Los Angeles, and that they conducted a stock brokerage business for some time under the corporate name, but later operated under the name of Harry 0. Weist.

Stating the offense as alleged in the indictment, and as shown by the evidence, it appears that through the operation and agency of the Securities Company, and Weist, as brokers and dealers respectively in shares of corporate stock, salesmen were employed to solicit customers and interest them in the purchase and sale of shares of the capital…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.