Cormond

Cormond v. United Railroads

Good Law
1919 Cal. App. LEXIS 517·41 Cal. App. 683·183 P. 218
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 20, 1919Civ. No. 2426.California1,374 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Waste, J.

This is an appeal by defendant from an order granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial in' an action for damages for personal injuries.

On the 10th of December, 1913, at about the hour of 2 o’clock in the afternoon of that day, an east-bound Sutter Street car, operated by the defendant, collided with a wagon then being driven by plaintiff in a southerly direction across the intersection of Sutter and Franklin Streets in the city of San Francisco. As a result of the collision plaintiff was thrown from the wagon and injured. He thereupon instituted this suit for damages, claiming that (1) the car was operated by defendant at a negligently excessive rate of speed, and (2) that defendant failed to avail itself of a last clear chance to avoid the accident. The defendant, by its answer, set up the defenses of contributory negligence and the failure on plaintiff’s own part to avail himself-of a last clear chance.

Upon the issues thus framed the case was' tried before a jury, which on July 3, 1915, returned its verdict in favor of defendant. Judgment being entered upon the verdict, plaintiff moved for and was granted a new trial upon one or other of the grounds set forth in his notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.