Penn

Penn v. Dyba

Good Law
115 Cal. App. 67·1931 Cal. App. LEXIS 664·1 P.2d 461
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 17, 1931Docket No. 713.California2,375 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Jennings, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants.

Upon conclusion of the trial of the issues herein presented, the court found that defendant Elizabeth Dyba was the owner of the real property, title to which is in dispute and that she owned it subject to a mortgage lien of E. A. Hill and to the lien of a deed of trust held by Mox, Inc., which the court found was subordinate to the mortgage lien of E. A. Hill. Judgment was entered accordingly. No brief has been filed on behalf of Elizabeth Dyba or Mox, Inc., and for the sake of convenience E. A. Hill, in whose behalf a brief has been filed, will be styled respondent and Elizabeth Dyba and Mox, Inc., will be referred to as defendants.

Appellant was the grantee in a deed executed by the city treasurer of the city of Los Angeles, in pursuance of a sale made by him to satisfy a street improvement bond issued upon an assessment for the improvement of a street. The complaint alleged a cause of action to quiet title. The defendants Elizabeth Dyba, Fidelity Mortgage Corporation and Mox, Incorporated, appeared and answered, claiming an interest in each defendant superior and adverse to that of plaintiff. Respondent E. A. Hill…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.