Harris

Harris v. Burt

Good Law
1920 Cal. App. LEXIS 550·47 Cal. App. 480·190 P. 1058
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 14, 1920Civ. No. 3318.California1,750 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Thomas, J.

Motion to dismiss appeal. From the record before us it appears that a judgment was entered against the defendant here in the superior court of Los Angeles County on the twenty-first day of June, 1919, for a total sum of $412.74; that on the third day of July, 1919, a notice of appeal to the supreme court was filed by the defendant in that court; that at the same time and place defendant also filed a demand for transcript, in accordance with the provisions of section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure, and gave an undertaking on appeal, with stay of execution, duly approved by the clerk of that court, as well as the undertaking provided for by section 953b of the Code of Civil Procedure, in the sum of one hundred dollars, agreeing to pay to the clerk the cost of preparing such transcript, which undertaking was likewise duly approved by the clerk; and that thereafter the clerk prepared what is usually denominated as the “Clerk’s Transcript,” which transcript was regularly filed in the superior court.

It also appears that the official reporter who reported the case, Mr. Henry Henderson, received no notice requiring the preparation of a phonographic report of the trial until…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.