Rezos

Rezos v. Zahm & Nagel Co.

Good Law
1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 357·78 Cal. App. 728·246 P. 564
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 19, 1926Docket No. 5062.California1,425 words

Opinion

Lead Opinion

Tyler, J.

Action to recover a commission amounting to the sum of $337.50 upon an alleged express agreement for the sale of a certain evaporator or grape-juice concentrator.

Defendant was the manufacturer of the machine and plaintiff claimed to be its agent in consummating the sale in question. The trial court so found and judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff in the sum prayed for, together with costs. The main ground relied upon for a reversal is that the evidence shows conclusively that plaintiff was acting as the agent of the buyer, for which reason he could not also be the agent of the seller.

The facts are substantially as follows: In the year 1922 the National Fruit Products Company, of Lodi, California, was manufacturing and selling grape-juice. Plaintiff' was engaged under a written contract with the company to dispose of the product upon a' commission basis. The exact nature of the agreement does not appear from the record, as the contract between the parties was not offered in evidence. Plaintiff was permitted, however, over objection, to testify concerning his business arrangement.

The company was desirous of purchasing an apparatus for the manufacture of its concoction…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.